Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Doga Turkmen vs Lisa Claeys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Turkmen vs Claeys analysis and find out who is favored!
Doga Turkmen vs Lisa Claeys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Turkmen 0 - 0 Claeys
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Turkmen has won 45.87% of points on their second serve, while Claeys has won 38.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Turkmen, in recent form, has won 58.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Claeys has won 60.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.17% and 46.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Turkmen has saved 53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Claeys has saved 49.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Turkmen has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 18/ 24), with Claeys winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Turkmen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 75/ 122), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Claeys has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Turkmen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.24% of matches (W/L 16/ 21), where as Claeys has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 8/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Turkmen has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.38 while Claeys has played against players with an average rank of 152.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Turkmen has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Claeys has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Turkmen has converted 51.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Claeys has converted 51.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
38% (95-158)
Career Total W/L
45% (15-18)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
64% (7-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Doga Turkmen | Lisa Claeys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 64% (7/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (26/27) | 58% (14/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (246/230) | 56% (127/98) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) | 64% (7/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 130.88 | 138.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1027/1439) | 64% (236/367) |
| 1st Serve W% | 51% (525/1027) | 52% (123/236) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (189/412) | 38% (50/131) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (102/198) | 52% (31/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (717/1434) | 52% (199/383) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (10/10) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 64% (7/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Doga Turkmen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Felitsata Dorofeeva-Rybas
Player
Doga Turkmen
79%
(
62 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
56%
(
44 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
50 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Julia Stamatova
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Doga Turkmen
60%
(
72 of
121)
1st Serve %
73%
(
82 of
112)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Granwehr
Player
Doga Turkmen
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Liisa Varul
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Doga Turkmen
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Benedetta Ortenzi
73%
(
58 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Siri Nyberg
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
15 of
35)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Doga Turkmen
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
51%
(
42 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Claeys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dia Evtimova
Player
Lisa Claeys
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Caroline Romeo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
53%
(
32 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Bela Tamhankar
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dana Baidaulet
Player
Lisa Claeys
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
58%
(
36 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Barbara Dessolis
Player
Lisa Claeys
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lisa Claeys
Player
Elena Grekul
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Turkmen Vs Claeys Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Doga Turkmen
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
